Joe Rogan, the outspoken host of the podcast “The Joe Rogan Experience,” recently made a daring prediction about the 2024 presidential election. Rogan conjectured that Vice President Kamala Harris may have the potential to defeat former President Donald Trump in the next race for the Oval Office. This bold statement has ignited significant discourse and shed light on the evolving dynamics of the 2024 election.
Joined by cultural commentator Michael Malice on a recent episode, Rogan initiated a frank dialogue about the forthcoming presidential election and Harris’ viability as a candidate. “She’s gonna win,” Rogan announced. Malice, taken aback, countered with, “No, she’s not.” Rogan clarified his position, stating, “I’m not saying because I think she’s going to, and I’m not saying because I want her to. I’m just being honest.”
Rogan’s forecast is based not on Harris’ popularity, but on Trump’s divisiveness. “I feel like we are in this very bizarre time where people are giving in to the bulls–t in a way that I never suspected people would before,” Rogan contended. His belief is that the overriding sentiment among voters is “no Trump, no matter what,” even if it means casting a vote for Harris.
Further elaborating on his prediction, Rogan proposed that even personalities like Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama could triumph over Trump if they chose to join the race. This remark emphasizes Rogan’s belief that the election could hinge more on anti-Trump sentiment than on the charisma of any individual candidate.
A key topic of debate between Rogan and Malice was the influence of the media on public opinion. Rogan expressed frustration over what he described as the “memory-holing” of major events, such as Trump’s attempted assassination on July 13. “You would have thought Trump getting shot would have had four years of corporate journalists talking about hate speech causing violence,” Malice observed. “To be like, ‘Let’s take a step back,’ and that went for, what, a week?”
Rogan and Malice argued that the media’s lack of sustained focus on such critical events indicates a broader issue of media prejudice. They discussed the role of tech giants like Google in shaping public discourse. Rogan asserted, “If I Google Donald Trump and Google gives you seven negative stories, it’s going to move the needle a little bit toward her [Harris].”
The pair also highlighted the contrast in media coverage between Trump and Harris. Rogan stated, “[Harris] is the least popular vice president of all time, and then in a moment, a moment in time, all of a sudden she’s our solution. She’s our hero. Try Googling a negative story on her, you won’t find one.”
This viewpoint aligns with Malice’s contention that the media’s representation of Harris is overwhelmingly positive, contrasting with the frequently negative coverage of Trump.
The discourse ignited by Rogan’s prediction and his conversation with Malice has generated substantial interest and debate. While some perceive Rogan’s comments as reflecting real concerns about media bias and the influence of tech companies, others interpret it as part of the ongoing dialogue surrounding Trump’s contentious political trajectory.
As the 2024 election draws nearer, the dynamics of the race are becoming increasingly complex, with Rogan’s prediction adding an intriguing element. Whether Harris can indeed triumph over Trump remains uncertain, but the conversation underscores the multifaceted aspects that can sway the outcomes of contemporary political campaigns.