Pope Leo Issues Explosive Historic Apology

Pope Leo XIV, the first American to lead the Catholic Church, delivered a thunderclap from Vatican City last week: a formal apology for the role medieval popes played in authorizing the enslavement of millions, woven into a sweeping manifesto on the dangers of artificial intelligence.

The 70-year-old pontiff released his first encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas,” or “Magnificent Humanity,” on Monday, May 25. The document, subtitled “On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence,” links the church’s centuries-old complicity in the transatlantic slave trade to what Leo calls “new forms of slavery” propagated by the digital economy and emerging technologies.

Past pontiffs have expressed regret for the participation of individual Christians in the trade in human beings. None had ever publicly acknowledged — much less apologized for — the role that popes themselves played in granting European sovereigns explicit authority to subjugate and enslave “infidels.” Leo did both.

“It is impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many in stark contrast to their immeasurable dignity as persons infinitely loved by the Lord,” Leo wrote, calling the Vatican’s record a “wound in Christian memory.” He added: “For this, in the name of the church, I sincerely ask for pardon.”

A Personal History Behind the Apology

The apology lands with particular weight given Leo’s own ancestry. The U.S.-born pope’s family tree contains both enslaved people and slave owners, a detail that has shadowed his pontificate since his election. For Black American Catholics, activists and scholars who have spent decades pressing the Holy See to atone for its colonial-era conduct, the encyclical marks a turning point.

Shannen Dee Williams, a historian at the University of Dayton and author of the 2022 book “Subversive Habits,” a history of American Black Catholic nuns, welcomed the encyclical as a “monumental step toward the kind of essential truth-telling and reparation that many Catholics have prayed and worked to witness.” She added that “Black Catholics have waited a long time to hear the Vatican speak honestly about the church’s leading roles in the trans-Atlantic slave trade and chattel slavery — and thus by extension the enduring systems of anti-Black racism in the world today.”

Five Centuries of Papal Bulls

For generations, the Vatican insisted it had always upheld the dignity of every human being as a child of God. The historical record tells a more damning story. A series of 15th-century papal directives effectively wrote the theological permission slip for European colonization of Africa and the Americas.

Pope Nicholas V issued “Dum Diversas” in 1452, granting Portuguese sovereigns the right “to invade, conquer, fight and subjugate” “Saracens, and pagans, and other infidels, and enemies of the name of Christ” and “to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery.” He followed with “Romanus Pontifex.” Pope Callixtus III reaffirmed the directives in 1456, Pope Sixtus IV expanded them in 1481, and Pope Leo X extended them again in 1514. Together, those bulls form the backbone of what became known as the Doctrine of Discovery, the legal-theological framework that legitimized the colonial-era seizure of land across two continents.

Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin presented the encyclical Monday alongside theologian Leocadie Lushombo, framing the apology not as an isolated gesture but as doctrinal teaching binding on the world’s roughly 1.3 billion Catholics.

Why AI Sits at the Center

Leo’s decision to bind the slavery apology to a treatise on artificial intelligence is not incidental. The pope argues that the same impulses that produced chattel slavery — the reduction of persons to commodities, the concentration of power, the moral blindness of those who profit — are reasserting themselves through algorithms and digital labor markets.

“This is why the memory of past complicity and blindness in the face of the injustice of slavery becomes a call to vigilance,” Leo wrote. “What we have learned, must be translated into discernment and responsibility in the present.”

The encyclical concedes that AI “can be a valuable tool” but warns that adopting it “rapidly and uncritically” exposes humanity to risks ranging from environmental damage to the warping of public discourse by “algorithms that … can magnify polarization and resentment.” The pope is most uncompromising on the battlefield, declaring that “it is not permissible to entrust lethal or otherwise irreversible decisions” to machines — a pointed observation given the Pentagon’s expanded use of AI tools.

“No algorithm can make war morally acceptable,” Leo wrote, arguing that automated systems “can only bring about conflict more quickly and render it more impersonal.”

He calls for “robust legal frameworks,” “independent oversight,” informed users and a political system that does not abdicate its responsibility, warning of advancements “concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a select few.” His prescription is blunt: “What is needed is a more active political involvement that is capable of slowing things down when everything is accelerating.”

By yoking that warning to an unprecedented reckoning with the church’s own past, Leo has signaled that his pontificate intends to measure the future against the failures of the past — and to name both without flinching.

━ latest articles

━ explore more

━ more articles like this